Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Robertson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jacob Robertson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Crocker et al v. City of Park Hills, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv01233
Plaintiff:
Dennis Crocker, Loretta Faye Dempsey and One Stop Muffler, LLC
Defendant:
City of Park Hills, Missouri, Rachel St. Pierre, Ray Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Cristobal et al
as 5:2021cv06089
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Defendant:
Ismael Cristobal, Lauren Houston, Richard McGregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Sams East, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05065
Plaintiff:
Joyce Robertson
Defendant:
Sams East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Buckner et al
as 6:2021cv03081
Defendant:
William E Thesson, Kendra Cantrell, Gregory Dugger and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Second Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Richard Love, Patrick Williams, Diana Shields and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Anderson
as 4:2021cv00339
Respondent:
Michael Anderson
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Robertson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robertson v. Yusuf et al
as 3:2021cv05019
Plaintiff:
Geroge L Robertson and George L Robertson
Defendant:
GSA Express LCC, Abdufatah Yusuf and GSA Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01579
Plaintiff:
Michael K Robertson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
