Cases 41 - 50 of 743
Elliot v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 1:2021cv06315
Plaintiff:
Susan Elliot and Susan Elliott
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Co., Thomas E. Jorden, Joseph R. Albi and others
Graff v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 1:2021cv05804
Plaintiff:
Matthew Graff
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Co., Thomas E. Jorden, Paul N. Eckley and others
Wang v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 1:2021cv05672
Defendant:
Hans Helmerich, Paul N. Eckley, Kathleen A. Hogenson and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Hall et al v. Warren et al
as 6:2021cv06296
Plaintiff:
Emily Good, National Lawyers Guild Rochester, Nicholas Robertson and others
Defendant:
Ralph Montinarelli, Monroe County, William Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lynn Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robertson et al v. Services for the Underserved, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Soloh Partners Inc. and Delanda Robertson
Defendant:
Services for the Underserved, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robertson v. Director
as 9:2020cv01405
Petitioner:
Carman Robertson
Respondent:
Hutchings Psychiatric Hospital and Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hargrave et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2020cv09387
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Marie Kelly, Ryan Marchbanks, Chasity DeLeon and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Robertson v. Keyser
as 1:2020cv04318
Petitioner:
Erick Robertson
Respondent:
William F. Keyser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
