Cases 41 - 50 of 524
ROBERTSON v. BERKS CREDIT & COLLECTIONS, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv01568
Plaintiff:
DALE T. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
BERKS CREDIT & COLLECTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROBERTSON v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00069
Petitioner:
FREDERICK J. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBERTSON v. PFIZER RETIREMENT COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
PFIZER RETIREMENT COMMITTEE and FIDELITY EXECUTIVE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
JENSON et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
JAMIE JENSON , AMBER JACKSON , MAGEN ALLEN and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALLEY v. IONOTA et al
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
IONOTA, D. ROBERTSON, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
JILL ARLENE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROWN et al v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2017cv03312
Receiver:
GARTOR K. BROWN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN K. CRAWFORD, JR., BOBBY CARPENTER, JAMAIL DASIM ROBERTSON and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, TERENCE FARRELL, KATH COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
BANKS v. SHANK et al
as 2:2016cv06504
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BANKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SHANK, TOLBERT, FAKOLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
