Cases 1 - 10 of 943
Goode v. Salius et al
as 3:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Jason Goode
Defendant:
Scott Salius, Cardona, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Russell, III
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
Warden Kristine Barone, Deputy Warden Jeanette Maldonado, Lieutenant Christian Bosque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckweiler v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Kyle H. Eckweiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Maldenado et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alvarado
Defendant:
Maldenado, Rich Hardy, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Criston Mitchell
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Rubio et al
as 3:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, Rick Scott, Chris Coons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
