Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Cheeley v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Cedric Cheeley
Defendant:
Jesse Rodriguez, Jonmatthew Martinez, Adnan Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Garza v. C.O. Ms. Flores et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Garza
Defendant:
C.O. Ms. Flores, Larissa Wysocki, Beens Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker v. Shah
as 23-20510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UTMB Nurse Bintaben Shah, Jerry Sanchez, Warden, Latoya Bradley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. BP Expl & Prod
as 23-30701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shah Muneer Akbar Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Shah v. Maple Energy Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, Riverstone Holdings, LLC and Railroad Commission of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Julia Hubbard et al v. Trammell S. Crow, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Julia Hubbard and Kayla Goedinghaus
Defendant:
Trammell S Crow, Jr., Dr. Benjamin Todd Eller, Richard Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shah v. Novelis
as 23-40231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vikramkumar J. Shah
Defendant / Appellee:
Novelis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
