Cases 1 - 10 of 11
v. Hero Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80107
Defendant:
Hero Labs, Inc. and Vishal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Duncan v. Transcend Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv09546
Plaintiff:
David Duncan
Defendant:
Transcend Inc., Minh Nguyen and Salome Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. University of Florida (UF) Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine et al
as 3:2020cv00737
Plaintiff:
MD Shirley E Jones and Shirley E. Jones
Defendant:
MD Charles J Haddad, MD Nipa R Shah, University of Florida Department of Community Health, College of Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Shah v. Ebix, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03229
Defendant:
Ash Sawhney, Darren Joseph, Robin Raina and others
Plaintiff:
Rupal J. Shah and Rupal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Oliver v. Careguardian, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02541
Defendant:
Joshua Bruno, Careguardian, Inc., John Does, 1-10 and others
Lead Plaintiff:
sandra oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Zheng v. General Electric Company, et al
as 1:2017cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wenchun Zheng, Ph.D.
Defendant:
General Electric Company , Kimberly Craver , Richard Bourgeois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forte v. Shah, et al
as 3:2011cv01143
Plaintiff:
Bryan Forte
Defendant:
Kaleem Shah , Calnet Inc. and DOES 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shakarjian v. Shah et al
as 3:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
Patrick Shakarjian
Defendant:
Kaleem Shah , Calnet Inc. and DOES 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anjali Shah v. Hyatt Corp
as 10-1492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANJALI SHAH, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS
Defendant - Appellant:
HYATT CORP
SHAH v. HYATT CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04286
Plaintiff:
ANJALI SHAH and ANJALI SHAH
Defendant:
HYATT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
