Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Mott v. Walmart Supercenter#221 et al
as 5:2024cv00443
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter#221, Walmart Inc, Walmart Stores East Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Mott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Begay v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Stacey Begay
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Kyle E. Waters, Matthew Orendorff and Stacey Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Sharp
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Stacey D Berry
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stacey Swanson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stacey v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Dawn Michelle Stacey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00567
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynnette Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
