Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Corley v. Mercedes Benz US International Inc
as 7:2019cv01400
Plaintiff:
Tanner Corley
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz US International Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McGriff, Seibels & Williams Inc v. Sparks et al
as 2:2019cv01196
Plaintiff:
McGriff, Seibels & Williams Inc
Defendant:
John Tanner, Darren Sonderman, Paul Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc01490
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV LLC, Directv, Inc and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Cooley et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cooley , Heather Adams , Rosie Boyd and others
Defendant:
HMR of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ross v. Goldsmith et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ross
Defendant:
Tanner Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dial v. Pulliam et al
as 4:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winston Dial
Defendant:
Teresa Tanner Pulliam and James H. Hard, IV
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02407
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Tanner and Marita Murphy
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Highland Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Battle et al v. DIRECTV, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02007
Plaintiff:
Kris Battle , Russell Blakely , Rodney Bridges and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc and DIRECTV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
