Cases 1 - 10 of 3,418
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golston v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Records Manager and others
Petitioner:
Shane A Golston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Vasquez v. New Mexico Department Of Corrections, et al
as 24-2058
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA TAFOYA-LUCERO, in her individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS SERVANDO ACOSTA and others
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
