Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Smith v. Town of Chino Valley, et al.
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, CHINO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation incorporated in the State of Arizona, UNKNOWN BROWN, named as RO Brown (CV21), individaully and as husband and others
Erick Dodakian v. Andrew Butters, et al
as 23-15484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERICK JOHN DODAKIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW BUTTERS, Badge #21242 and CITY OF TEMPE, AKA Tempe Police Department
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5, Black Corporations 1-5 and White Partnerships 1-5
Patsy Sakuma v. Assoc. of Apt. Owners of the Tropics at Waikele, et al
as 22-16929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration v. Babaee et al
as 1:2019cv04989
Defendant:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York City Environmental Control Board, Leah Babaee and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the Government of the United States of America and Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Administrator of the Small Business Administration, and Agency of the Government of the United States of America v. Omari et al
as 1:2019cv04978
Defendant:
Donna Omari, Daniel Rahimzada, "John Doe # 1-5" & "Jane Doe # 1-5" and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator of the Small Business Administration, and Agency of the Government of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Patsy Sakuma v. Association of Apartment Owner, et al
as 19-16615
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, a Hawaii corporation, ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, DOES, John Does, 1-5; Jane Does, 1-5; Doe Partnerships, 1-5; Doe Corporations, 1-5; Doe Goverment Units, 1-5 and others
Defendant:
YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a liability law partnership and LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA
Patsy Sakuma v. Association of Apartment Owner, et al
as 16-16791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 14-15189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIRIAM MENDIOLA-MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: Jane Doe Officers 1-5, John Doe Officers 1-5, Jane Doe Doctors 1-5, John Doe Doctors 1-5, Jane Doe Nurses 1-5, and John Doe Nurses 1-5 (in their individual capacities), COUNTY OF MARICOPA, as named in amended complaint and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
