Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 19-56390
Defendant / Appellee:
MRC RECEIVABLES, ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Plaintiff:
LAVANCHY JOHNSON, RICHARD RAMCHARITAR, RUTH MOYA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Jennifer Morgan v. The Credit Repair Group et al
as 2:2014cv01985
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, The Credit Repair Group and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Morgan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ardith Adams v. Farm Bureau Financial Services, et al
as 12-16861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARDITH ELAINE ADAMS, Estate of Martel Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
FARM BUREAU FINANCIAL SERVICES, FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: Partnerships A-Z, Corporations 1-20, and Limited Liability Entities 1-20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv08119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
