Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYERS et al v. FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02110
Defendant:
Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Jim Dorton Contracting, Graco Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cody King, Samuel L. Smith, Savannah D. Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MORRIS v. MUTUAL INDUSTRIES NORTH, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02857
Defendant:
INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., EDMUND DUNN, MUTUAL INDUSTRIES NORTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BRITAX CHILD SAFETY, INC. v. NUNA INTERNATIONAL B.V. et al
as 5:2017cv02724
Plaintiff:
BRITAX CHILD SAFETY, INC.
Defendant:
NUNA INTERNATIONAL B.V. and NUNA BABY ESSENTIALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
OHL v. CITY OF EASTON et al
as 5:2016cv06115
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH J. OHL
Defendant:
CITY OF EASTON , NIK PUBLIC SAFETY, INC. and SAFARILAND, LLC
Cross_claimant:
CITY OF EASTON
Cross_defendant:
NIK PUBLIC SAFETY, INC. and SAFARILAND, LLC
Respondent:
PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO., LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
