Cases 21 - 30 of 5,197
Lema-Tenesaca v. Garland
as 24-1118
Petitioner:
MARTIN SEBASTIAN LEMA-TENESACA, CARLA DANIELA QUIZHPI-FAICAN and DOMENICA ISABELLA LEMA-QUIZHPI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hall v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv03172
Plaintiff:
Angela Marie Hall
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eason v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Bwana Eason
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Winsome Doreen Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tejeda v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Aida Tejeda
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amato v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Robert John Amato
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Illery v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Lora Elizabeth Illery
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MIRZA et al v. New York City Transit Authority et al
as 1:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Martin MIRZA and Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Defendant:
New York City Transit Authority and TRANSIT WORKERS UNION L 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Udofia v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Francis Ifiok Udofia
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ulitto
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
