Cases 31 - 40 of 4,227
Cross v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, The et al
as 1:2024cv03209
Plaintiff:
Darryl Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Pentagon Federal Credit Union, The, John Dorn, Shashi Vohra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Watson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Watson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anguis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anguis
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Caroline M. Meyer
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jahinsha v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03192
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nahrain Jahinsha
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITHEY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
JAMIE NICOLE SMITHEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MILLER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KENNEDY et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
TYLER JOSEPH KENNEDY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
