Cases 1 - 10 of 632
Allen v. Science Applications International Corporation
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
William Allen
Defendant:
Science Applications International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harrison v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Clay
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kim Allen Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Allen v. Newton et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Antionette Allen
Defendant:
Byron Zebedee Newton, Samuel Maxine Henderson and Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Bullit Co CHFS et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Allen Smith
Defendant:
Bullit Co CHFS and Commonwealth Cabinet for Health and Family Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. USA
as 6:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
McKeanzie Allen
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hatcher v. Valentine et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Hatcher
Respondent:
Warden Ann Valentine and Attorney General Russel Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. UNICO, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Brian Terrell
Defendant:
UNICO, LLC, Georg North America, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc. doing business as Allen-Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Securities and Exhange Commission v. Larmore et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exhange Commission
Defendant:
Jonathan Larmore, ArciTerra Companies, LLC, ArciTerra Note Advisors II, LLC and others
Receiver:
Allen Applbaum
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
