Cases 1 - 10 of 120
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS et al v. CORDERO et al
as 2:2023cv02905
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE KEYS and CHANTIN BULLOCK
Defendant:
PRUDENCIO CORDERO and Drive New Jersey Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BULLOCK v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2022cv03764
Plaintiff:
MONROE E. BULLOCK
Defendant:
CHRISTY MARTIN and ELIZABETH L. TOPLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02784
Plaintiff:
APRIL BULLOCK
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adkins et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01487
Plaintiff:
GREG ADKINS, JAMIE ASHTON, PAQUITA BAILY and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullock v. USA
as 4:2021cv01257
Petitioner:
Julious Bullock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bryant et al v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2020cv04386
Plaintiff:
Nina Bryant, Aaniyah Lark, Myche Douglas and others
Defendant:
Police Officer John Doe and City of Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLOCK v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04376
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CHERYL BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
