Cases 1 - 9 of 9
YUEN et al v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INC et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
CAM YUEN, ARRIANNA GARCIA, KATHRYN HEBERLING and others
Defendant:
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC and IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NORRIS v. CAPE ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv00466
Plaintiff:
SHAEL NORRIS
Defendant:
NATHAN CARPENTER, CAPE ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONNA WOLFROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIDGES v. COUNTY OF YORK MAINE et al
as 2:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BRIDGES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, SHERIFF WILLIAM KING, COUNTY OF YORK MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPENTER v. FRANCHINI et al
as 1:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CARPENTER
Defendant:
THOMAS FRANCHINI, DAVID J SHULKIN and RYAN LILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
CARPENTER v. ETHICON INC et al
as 2:2016cv00367
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CARPENTER
Defendant:
ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al
as 1:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Defendant:
RICHARD LAHAYE, JR, JESSICA DANIELSON, MICHAEL LARRIVEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT et al v. ROARK CAPITAL GROUP INC
as 2:2009cv00421
Plaintiff:
STANLEY DUKE BENNETT , RICHARD HOWARD , SUSAN WELCH and others
Defendant:
ROARK CAPITAL GROUP INC , ROARK CAPITAL PARTNERS LP , ROARK CAPITAL PARTNERS PARALLEL LP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRESCOTT v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE PRESCOTT , SHANNON ROSE , LAURA ORDWAY and others
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY v. NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
as 2:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
