Cases 1 - 10 of 330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Eulalia Tino-De La Cruz, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1642
Petitioner:
Eulalia Lourdes Tino-De La Cruz and P.M.Z.T.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Cruz-Basurto v. Falkenrath
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Isidro Cruz-Basurto
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farland Gilliehan v. St. Charles County Court, et al
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
Farland L. Gilliehan
Defendant:
St. Charles County Circuit Court, St. Charles County Jail, Dan Keen, St. Charles County Jail Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Jose Medina De La Cruz
as 23-3774
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Francisco Medina De La Cruz, also known as Spider
Cruz et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03739
Plaintiff:
Louis Cruz and Elizabeth Cruz
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
