Cases 1 - 10 of 417
Evans v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04944
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Evans
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, I. A. Rodriguez, R. Zhu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Finch v. Village of Sauk Village
as 1:2024cv04608
Plaintiff:
Anthony Finch
Defendant:
Village of Sauk Village and Derrick Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Leutz et al
as 3:2024cv03096
Plaintiff:
Cassius Brown
Defendant:
Darr Leutz, Brittany Greene, Zorian Trusewych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Clark
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Derrick G. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wells v. Idleberg et al
as 1:2024cv01531
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Wells
Defendant:
John D. Idleberg, Nicholas Kalfas and Lake County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Blunt-Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Brittany Martin
Defendant:
Doug Blunt-Stevens, Cathy Greer, Jane Mokus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
