Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01575
Plaintiff:
Edwin E Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv02088
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Allen v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2015cv03035
Plaintiff:
Junigh E Allen
Defendant:
City of Columbus and David Salsgiver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornell et al v. Zanesville Housing Development Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02713
Plaintiff:
William Cornell and Jennifer Cornell
Defendant:
Zanesville Housing Development Corporation, Zanesville Metropolitan Housing Authority, Steven G Randles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
Charlotte E Allen and Richard Allen
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. and Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Morgan
as 1:2011cv00813
Petitioner:
James E. Allen
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Beck et al
as 3:2010cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jean Davis
Defendant:
Daniel W. Beck, John E Allen, John E Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. D. Scott Carruthers, et al
as 1:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Scott Carruthers and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Allen v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Allen and Thomas E. Allen
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
