Cases 41 - 50 of 4,405
Cleveland v. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cleveland
Defendant:
Andrew Flores, Larry Palmer and Kimberly Fruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Flores v. Larkins
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Tony Flores
Defendant:
Jocelyn Larkins
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ochoa Contreras, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1407
Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL OCHOA CONTRERAS, VICTORIA FLORES PALACIOS and JAMIE JAMES OCHOA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pineda Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER PINEDA LOPEZ, BLANCA FLORES DE PINEDA, FREDY PINEDA FLORES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Guillen, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1391
Petitioner:
LESLY SUCELY FLORES GUILLEN and JOSE ANGEL LUCERO FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Elliot et al v. Spe Terra Nova Apartment Owners LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Russell Elliot, Nelly Elliot, E. D. and others
Defendant:
Spe Terra Nova Apartment Owners LLC, Apartment Management Consultants LLC, Victoria Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982 hs Discrimination re property rights (housing)
4340 W. Adams, LLC v. Berta Yaneth Alvarado Flores et al
as 2:2024cv01815
Plaintiff:
4340 W. Adams, LLC
Defendant:
Berta Yanet Alvarado Flores, Hector Mario Santiesteban Carreno, Eliseo Vargas and others
Martinez Flores, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1251
Petitioner:
FANY CARIDAD MARTINEZ FLORES and LIAM SAID CARIAS MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raymond Flores v. Tesla Inc.
as 2:2024cv01828
Petitioner:
Raymond Flores
Respondent:
Tesla Inc a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
