Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner: Ramon Flores
Respondent: Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adam Flores v. USA
as 24-1838
Petitioner: ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff: Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant: Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant: FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANAY v. BRANHAN et al
as 1:2023cv01948
Plaintiff: MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant: D. BRANHAN, C. SWEASON, III, ISSAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15320
Plaintiff: Rodney Miller, Eric Miller, Edwin G. Enger and others
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart, Don Beachem and Ms. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borne v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv05457
Plaintiff: Zachary Borne
Defendant: Thomas J Dart, Cook County Sheriff Officers, Officer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05123
Plaintiff: DeRay Shaun Huggins
Defendant: County Of Cook, M Anguiano, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00199
Petitioner: ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?