Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Flores v. Osterday
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angel Flores
Defendant:
Osterday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Landsman et al
as 3:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angel Flores
Defendant:
Landsman, Cordell, Osterday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Elkhart County of Indiana et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angel Flores
Defendant:
Elkhart County of Indiana, Goshen Policy Department, Osterday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02908
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE FLORES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02909
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE FLORES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
DANNY FLORES
Defendant:
T.J WATSON and WILLIAM E. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAUCETT v. CARTAGENA et al
as 1:2021cv02309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. FAUCETT
Defendant:
W. CARTAGENA, Y. FLORES and SHONDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLESKEY et al v. FLORES
as 1:2021cv02162
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY and others
Defendant:
ARTURO FLORES d/b/a FLORES STUCCO, MASONRY & DEMOLITION LLC and ARTURO FLORES doing business as FLORES STUCCO, MASONRY & DEMOLITION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FLORES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02083
Plaintiff:
Jean Flores
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01304
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
