Cases 11 - 20 of 1,747
Chacon Flores v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Chacon Flores
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC and Baybrook Mall, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rincon v. Martinez III et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ismael Rincon
Defendant:
Santiago Martinez, III, Eduardo Flores, Victor Vicharelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. loandepot.com, LLC
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Flores, Jr.
Defendant:
loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adimora-Nweke v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ernest Adimora-Nweke
Defendant:
Harris County, Houston Police Department, CWS Galleria, 5250 L.P. d/b/a "M5250" Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Flores, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jesus Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flores v. Zapata County et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Baldomero Flores
Defendant:
Texas Zapata County, Jose Martinez and Fernando Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Flores v. Berleth et al
as 7:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Robert W. Berleth and Derek Loetzerich
Other:
Robert R Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
