Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Flores v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Flores
Defendant:
Frank Smith , Mark Becker , Gerardo Garza, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. GET CARGO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03525
Plaintiff:
KARI CUMMINGS
Defendant:
LEONEL FLORES and GET CARGO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GONZALES MARTINEZ et al v. HOG SLAT, INC.
as 2:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. FLORES, JOSE L. GONZALES MARTINEZ, NENSON HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
HOG SLAT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FLORES v. COOK INC et al
as 1:2016cv02216
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN NICHOLE FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLORES-DELGADO v. USA
as 1:2016cv01516
Petitioner:
ANTONIO FLORES-DELGADO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Flores
as 2:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory J Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. BARRERA et al
as 1:2016cv00970
Defendant:
SAMUEL BARRERA, BENITO BRITO FLORES and REST MEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Flores v. USA
as 1:2016cv00062
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael L Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2015cv01651
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
