Cases 1 - 10 of 2,875
Hale v. Bell County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hale
Defendant:
Bell County Fiscal Court, Gary Ferguson, Deputy Joshua Collett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Gerson Company v. Big Lots, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
The Gerson Company
Defendant:
Big Lots, Inc., Big Lots ECommerce LLC, Big Lots Stores, Inc. doing business as Big Lots and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Brown v. USA et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sandy Brown
Defendant:
USA and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v Doe
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
John Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Padgett et al v. The County of Meade, Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Theresa Padgett and David Padgett
Defendant:
The County of Meade, Kentucky and John Doe Nos. I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
