Cases 1 - 10 of 451
JOHNSON v. WELLS FARGO, et al.
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
THI-KING SHABAZZ JOHNSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO and MICHAEL P. SANTOMASSIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Donald Eugene King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
UH Carolina Realty Holdings LLC et al v. Appalachian/Brian Estates, Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
UH CAROLINA REALTY HOLDINGS LLC, UH CAROLINA SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC and UH CAROLINA VACANT LAND HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
APPALACHIAN/ BRIAN ESTATES, INC, UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES/ GREENSBORO, LLC, UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES/ BRUNSWICK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. KING et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
TINIKA SECAL WARREN
Defendant:
MATTHEW KING, HUD OFFICE GREENSBORO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
