Cases 1 - 10 of 248
Khan v. Abbott Laboratories CT Corporation Service Company
as 1:2024cv02753
Plaintiff:
Iqra Shamim Khan
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories CT Corporation Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Khan v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Shiraz Khan
Defendant:
Kevin J. Riddle and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Walker v. Khan et al
as 1:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Sidney Walker
Defendant:
Dr. Khan, N.P. Lindgren, M. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14543
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Lucifer Morningstar, Lukin Art and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
