Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAG Alaska, Inc. v. KAYAK, official number 556866 et al
as 3:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
JAG Alaska, Inc.
Defendant:
KAYAK, official number 556866, KAYAK, Inc., Northern Marine and Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
William Carol Clarke vs. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al.
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Communications Commission, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cathey v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
King David Jai Wynte Cathey
Respondent:
Krista Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cathey v. State Trooper et al
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
King David Cathey
Defendant:
State Trooper and Christie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abruska v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2021cv00223
Petitioner:
Mattfi Abruska
Respondent:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Earl Houser, Loutzenhiser and others
Retriever Tender Alaska LLC v. King
as 3:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Retriever Tender Alaska LLC
Defendant:
Jason King
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101
Lambert et al v. Powerhouse Gaming, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mark Lambert and Business Technology Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., Tab King, Inc., Dynamic Game Development, Inc. and others
King v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Marcus Loyd King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
