Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
. Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lahr v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00972
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lahr
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dorn v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Lisa Weitekamp, David W. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poor v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01738
Plaintiff:
William Poor
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Willis, Yvette Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dibble v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Terry Dibble
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Carissa Luking, Lorie Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Romeo Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden David Gomez, Warden Kenneth Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lahr v. Nevels
as 1:2021cv00432
Plaintiff:
Randall I Lahr, Sr and Randall Irvin Lahr, Sr
Defendant:
Reggie Nevels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Meyers et al
as 3:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Defendant:
Percy Meyers, Sabrina Stevens, Tammy Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAHR v. NEVELS
as 1:2021cv02875
Plaintiff:
RANDALL I. LAHR, SR.
Defendant:
REGGIE NEVELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundquist et al v. Burgoyne et al
as 1:2021cv00418
Plaintiff:
Shyla Lahr Lundquist, Kash Neal and Amari Neal
Defendant:
Michael Burgoyne and Keypoint Carriers Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
