Cases 1 - 10 of 755
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Romero-Lemus v. Garland
as 24-1046
Petitioner:
BRYAN STEVEN ROMERO-LEMUS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Purewal v. InstaRisa Digital Dental Technologies, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Chandeep Purewal
Defendant:
InstaRisa Digital Dental Technologies, LLC, InstaRisa Technologies, LLC, Dr. Jose Arthur Mirelez Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lemus v. Richison
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
CONZUELO LEMUS
Defendant:
CHAD R. RICHISON as Trustee of the CHAD R. RICHISON REVOCABLE TRUST and Chad R. Richison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lemus v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lainez Lemus
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Dr. Jesus F. Jara, Ronnie Guerzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tomas Gonzalez, Tomas' Concrete and Alejandro Lemus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
