Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02578
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Dr. Mann, Fennie Clay and Dr. Sabfive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Sabbeen et al
as 4:2024cv02379
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Sabbeen and Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Dr. Mann and Dr. Sabben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Bass, Unknown Barundo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neeley v. Goodyear, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02319
Plaintiff:
Marshun Neeley
Defendant:
Goodyear, City of, Goodyear Police Department, Santiago Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Manns v. Trate
as 1:2023cv01539
Petitioner:
Tony Manns
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Manns v. Trate
as 1:2023cv01382
Petitioner:
Tony Manns
Respondent:
Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Zimmerman v. Buenrostro et al
as 2:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
Kameron Lee Zimmerman
Defendant:
Nicholas Buenrostro, Andrew Mann and Zachary Hardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lionel Tate, Sr. v. L. Chavez, et al
as 23-15796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIONEL TATE, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. CHAVEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS and others
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
