Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Jason Miles v. Michelle Floyd
as 24-1096
Petitioner:
JASON MICHAEL MILES
Respondent:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Miles #237011 v. Quainton et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Kushawn S. Miles #237011
Defendant:
Unknown J. Quainton, Unknown Tillitson, Unknown McLair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartnick #758888 v. Carr
as 1:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Miles Christian Bartnick #758888
Defendant:
Unknown Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muthana et al v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv12255
Plaintiff:
Ali Musaid Muthana, Mikel Smith, Joshua Paradien and others
Defendant:
Jodi L DeAngelo, Zarie Phillips, J. Gonzalez and others
Miles v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Miles
Defendant:
Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Dickson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miles
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Office, Southern Medical Associates, Sgt. (f/n/u) Siddal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles #237011 v. Surety et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kushawn S. Miles #237011
Defendant:
Unknown Surety, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles #237011 v. Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Kushawn S. Miles #237011
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
