Cases 1 - 10 of 44
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD MILES
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL, MEDSTREET MEDICAL and LEGACY BEHAVIORAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. DENIES et al
as 5:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
RODNEY J MILES
Defendant:
MR HINES, MR CLARK and DENIES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. SMITH
as 4:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
MICHAEL NIKIETH MILES
Respondent:
Warden TAMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. UNITED STATES
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILES FOSTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. JOHN OR JANE DOE et al
as 5:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILES FOSTER
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
MARK S DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN MYERS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIE MOBLEY, CAPT ZIRKLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
