Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Berdecia et al v. Matos-Negron et al
as 3:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Nelson R Berdecia, Annia Berdecia and Ricardo Berdecia
Defendant:
Dr. Jose A Matos-Negron, Dr. Carlos E Marrero-Ortiz, Dr. Arlene Hernandez-Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Berdecia et al v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc. d/b/a HIMA San Pablo Bayamon et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Nelson R Berdecia, Annia Berdecia, Conjugal Partnership Berdecia-Berdecia and others
Defendant:
Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc. d/b/a HIMA San Pablo Bayamon, Dr. Jose A Matos-Negron, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Montoya v. GoPro Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montoya
Defendant:
GoPro Inc. and ACME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Fuentes-Catala et al
as 3:2016cv03023
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Defendant:
Jessica X. Fuentes-Catala, Jaime Alberto Montoya-Quintero and Conjugal Partnership Montoya-Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Planes et al
as 3:2015cv02899
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Oscar Favier Planes, Isabel Montoya-Parnizan and Conjugal Partnership Planes-Montoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. USA (Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al
as 3:2013cv01840
Plaintiff:
Louis Gomez
Defendant:
USA (Department of Housing and Urban Development), Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montoya v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01473
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mario Montoya
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
