Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Werner v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Werner
Defendant:
Judy Smith , Jim Zanon, Robert Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack et al v. Wall et al
as 1:2015cv00891
Petitioner:
Alan David McCormack, Toran D Brooks, Theodore J Chambers and others
Respondent:
Edward F Wall , Kathleen Nagle, Tina R Virgil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joiner-El, Philip v. Westfield, Dan et al
as 3:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
Philip H. Joiner-El
Defendant:
Dan Westfield , Emily Davidson , Kathleen Nagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh, Aman v. Marks, K. et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Aman Singh
Defendant:
K. Marks , Cathy Jess, Paul Kemper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Petitioner:
Terrance J Shaw
Respondent:
Judy P Smith and Kathleen Nagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lagar, Humberto v. Raemisch, Richard et al
as 3:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
Humberto Lagar
Defendant:
Richard F. Raemisch , Gary H. Hamblin , Alfonso J. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey, Leighton v. Clark, T. et al
as 3:2012cv00923
Plaintiff:
Leighton D. Lindsey
Defendant:
T. Clark , David Gardner, Mr. or Mrs. Hable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman, James v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
James J. Kaufman
Defendant:
Gary H. Hamblin , Kathryn Anderson , Katherine Nagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van De Yacht v. City of Wausau et al
as 3:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Christine Van De Yacht
Defendant:
City of Wausau, James Tipple, William Nagle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
