Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Anderson et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10680
Plaintiff:
Damian Anderson, Mitch Bartholomew, Guy Beaver and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Odom #161794 v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Steven Odom #161794
Defendant:
E. Coe Hill, Lizabeth Ralles, Lisa A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaramillo et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11354
Plaintiff:
Joseph Necaise, Leland Miller, Paul Connolly and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Odom #228931 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board
as 1:2018cv01199
Petitioner:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Odoms
as 2:2018mj30359
Defendant:
Alton Odoms
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Odoms
as 2:2018mj30359
Defendant:
Alton Odoms
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Bellis vs. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
McFadden Bellis , M C.1. , Eyondra McFadden and others
Petitioner:
Arnett Rison, III and A.1 R.IV.
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom #228931 v. Christiansen et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Unknown Blair, Unknown Christiansen, Unknown Beaushane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12116
Plaintiff:
JOYCE CRUZ , A. C.1. , A. C.2. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., LEO A. DALY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
