Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Morrison v. Austin et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jona Morrison
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Dennis Goodnight, James Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Odom v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jody Andrew Odom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Goode et al v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Nuance Communications, Inc., Nuance Transcription Services, Inc., Transcend Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Goode, Connie Christensen, Debora T Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schaapveld v. Sulphur, City of et al
as 6:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schaapveld
Defendant:
Sulphur, City of, Murray County Board of County Commissioners, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Co LP et al
as 5:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Perry Odom and Carolyn Odom
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co LP , The Boler Company, Hendrickson USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Odom v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00183
Respondent:
United States of America
Movant:
Brady Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Odom v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Odom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 5:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, Barack Obama, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Trammell
as 6:2012cv00391
Petitioner:
Carl M. Odom
Respondent:
Anita Trammell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Pontotoc County District Court
as 6:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Odom
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
