Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv30016
Plaintiff:
Marta Ortiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ortiz v. Saba University School of Medicine et al
as 1:2023cv12002
Plaintiff:
Natalia Ortiz
Defendant:
Saba University School of Medicine and R3 Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ramos-Ortiz v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11946
Plaintiff:
Zayra Ramos-Ortiz
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortiz et al v. New Rez LLC
as 1:2023cv11222
Plaintiff:
Diomedes Ortiz
Defendant:
New Rez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Ortiz v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10412
Plaintiff:
John Ortiz
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv11571
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe, Nancy Doe, Doe Jane and others
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy Miller, William A. Ferrara and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ortiz v. City of Revere et al
as 1:2021cv11527
Plaintiff:
Ortiz Amanda and Amanda Ortiz
Defendant:
City of Revere, City of Revere Police Department and Marc Birritteri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv10792
Plaintiff:
Denise Mae Ortiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
