Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Petersen v. West Technology Group, LLC
as 4:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Nicole Petersen
Defendant:
West Technology Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pulliam v. West Technology Group, LLC
as 8:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Michelle Pulliam, Marina Mauldin and Nicole Petersen
Defendant:
West Technology Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Petersen v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 8:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Petersen
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Petersen v. Peterson et al
as 8:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Aryan Petersen
Defendant:
Shane Peterson, II and Hadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. Gompert et al
as 8:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
Defendant:
Josh Gompert and Aaron Petersen
Petersen et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Clinton Petersen and Fayne Petersen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Omaha Douglas FCU v. Petersen
as 8:2018mc00115
Plaintiff:
Omaha Douglas FCU
Defendant:
Arnold Kye Petersen
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Petersen v. Bitters et al
as 8:2016cv00183
Defendant:
William E. Bitters, Robert W. Boland, Jr., John L. Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joyce Rosamond Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
D'Ercole v. Harrahs Hotel Resort et al
as 8:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Eric J. D'Ercole
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections Department, Brian Eyberg, Harrahs Hotel Resort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
