Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Maxor National Pharmacy Services, LLC v. PHARMAFORCE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01379
Plaintiff:
Maxor National Pharmacy Services, LLC
Defendant:
PHARMAFORCE GROUP, LLC, Daniel Dimitri and Anthony Velasquez
TOUSSAINT v. VELASQUEZ
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
RADAMES VELASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasquez v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Angela Velasquez
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre, Twerdy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VELASQUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv05015
Plaintiff:
LUIS SAMUEL VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VELASQUEZ v. LITZ et al
as 3:2021cv01658
Petitioner:
Moses Velasquez
Respondent:
Tina M. Litz, Timothy Fierro, Juan Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VELASQUEZ v. MINTZ et al
as 3:2021cv01659
Plaintiff:
Moses Velasquez
Defendant:
TINA MINTZ, Timothy Fierro, Juan Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. MINTZ et al
as 2:2021cv04159
Plaintiff:
MOSES VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
TINA MINTZ, TIMOTHY FIERRO, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. LITZ et al
as 2:2021cv04162
Petitioner:
MOSES VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
TINA M. LITZ, TIMOTHY FIERRO, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALCANTARA et al v. DURAN LANDSCAPING, INC.
as 2:2021cv03947
Plaintiff:
BYRON ALCANTARA, LUIS ROBERTO RUIZ VELASQUEZ and RAYMUNDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DURAN LANDSCAPING, INC. doing business as DURAN LANDSCAPING & HARDSCAPING, LLC doing business as DURANS LANDSCAPING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 20
NASH v. VELASQUEZ et al
as 5:2021cv03268
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
DR MARIA VELASQUEZ, BERKS COUNTY and WERNERSVILLE STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
