Cases 51 - 60 of 753
Alonso v. Quan
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUAN, POLI FLORES, (NFN) ROSS and others
MASK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LARRY MASK and KELLY ANN MASK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Crump et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randall Crump and SHARON WILLIAMS CRUMP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WOODS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01037
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Boyd v. US
as 23-2104
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOYD, JR. and KARA BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESTER BONNER and PRINCESS WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
TONELLI et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. TONELLI, WILLIAM BENNETT, THERESA BENNETT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bowser v. Department of the Army, Fort A.P. Hill
as 23-2004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BOWSER
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT A.P. HILL
WOTAWA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00831
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WOTAWA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GurveyIn re: Gurvey
as 23-134
Petitioner:
In re: AMY REBECCA GURVEY
Respondent:
COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LIVE NATION, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
