Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Ward v. Nichols et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
CO Nichols, CO Marwitz and Lt Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurkowski v. Spafford et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Patrick R. Kurkowski
Defendant:
Austin Spafford, Tanner Pardun, Officer Magnun and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Noble
as 2:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Lathan Steven Ward
Respondent:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Carrillo et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E Smith
Defendant:
Samantha Carrillo, Cheryl Ward, Christina Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Wenger et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
Erin Wenger, Haseleu, CO Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurkowski v. Spafford et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Patrick R Kurkowski
Defendant:
Austin Spafford, Tanner Pardun, Officer Magnun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
Sgt Williams, Sgt Gail, CO Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pufahl, Kimberly et al v. Ward, Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kimberly L. Pufahl and Jered E. Franke
Defendant:
Kimberly J. Ward, Diane Fronk (Franke) and Ayla Fronk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Karen et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Karen, Lakeisha, Cheryl Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez, Lena v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lena Sanchez
Defendant:
Montgomery Ward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
