Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,688
Williams v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Matthew Williams
Defendant: Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Deverick Scott
Defendant: James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff: Rodric D Cohns
Defendant: Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: James C Chenault
Defendant: S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pate v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff: William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant: Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Elias et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant: Mattrew Elias, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Does
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff: William Lee Terrell
Defendant: Does Unknown Agents, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff: Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant: Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 5:2024cv05077
Plaintiff: Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant: Lieutenant Cynthia Conway, Major Joseph Mahoney, Warden James Shipment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?