Cases 41 - 50 of 1,689
Williams v. Clary et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary, Foster Danial, Vernon Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clary et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary, Foster Danial, Vernon Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
William T Mayfield
Defendant:
Gilliam, King, Blaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boals v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Taylor Boals
Defendant:
Connie Hubbard, Christopher Budnilk, Tasha Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Staley et al
as 4:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Hale
Defendant:
John Staley, Robert Wakefield and Michea Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Runion et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
Zachary Scott Davis
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Sergeant McGrew, Corporal Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
