Cases 1 - 10 of 454
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radiance Technologies Inc v. Wright et al
as 5:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Radiance Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Christopher Wright, Blake Anderton and Theo Kleinsorge
Wright v. Webb
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Adam Wright
Defendant:
Ronny Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Fairfield City Board of Education
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Yolanda S Wright
Defendant:
Fairfield City Board of Education, Fairfield Board of Education and Fairfield City School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright v. USA
as 1:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Quacy Tom Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vertos Medical Inc v. Folsom Metal Products Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Vertos Medical Inc
Defendant:
Folsom Metal Products Inc, Greg Martin, Jeff Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wright et al v. Brookside, Town of et al
as 2:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Kwame Wright, Kaitlyn Mishae Russell and Lonnie Pratt
Defendant:
Brookside, Town of, Michael Jones, Bradley Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
