Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 97
April Malick, et al v. Croswell-Lexington District Schools, et al
as 24-1147
Plaintiff: APRIL MALICK, Individually and as Next Friend of C.M., a minor, ROB MALICK, Individually and as Next Friend of C.M., a minor and C. M., a Minor by Next Friends Rob and April Malick
Defendant: CROSWELL-LEXINGTON DISTRICT SCHOOLS, CROSWELL-LEXINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, DAN GILBERTSON, in his individual and official capacity and others
in re: Petition of Freedom Marine Sales LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02890
Petitioner: PETITION OF FREEDOM MARINE SALES LLC, as titled owner, and FREEDOM BOAT CLUB LLC, as owner pro hac vice of and for the M/V TIMELESS, a 2023 Crownline E235XS, hull identification number KIS89500C323, h
Counter Defendant: Freedom Marine Sales LLC and Freedom Boat Club LLC
Respondent: Peter J. Mackey
Claimant: Madelyn Alvarez, Israel Jose Marquez Hernandez, I. M. (youngest - minor) and others
Intervenor: John Cornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jason Brown, et al v. Cyrus Dolbin, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON L. BROWN and A. M. B., Minor Child of Jason L. Brown
Defendant: CYRUS P. DOLBIN, Judge, MARK A. BARKET, Custody Officer, KAREN E. RISMILLER, Lawyer and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. DOMALAKES, Judge, DAVID RICE, Asst. DA, MICHEAL A. STINE, Public Defender and others
Marte et al v. BURLINGTON STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04709
Plaintiff: Estefany Marte, J. J. M., a minor and J.J.M.
Defendant: BURLINGTON STORES, INC., MAP Real Estate, LLC, BURLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matthew Wilson, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 23-16185
Plaintiff / Appellee: MATTHEW WILSON, JOSHUA BARNES and L. M., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem Tilda Barnes
Defendant: CITY OF OAKLAND and CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN DOMBY, SEAN DEISE and JOSE ORTEGA
Eulalia Mateo-Mateo, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2694
Petitioner: EULALIA MATEO-MATEO, M. A. B.-M., a minor and L. M. M.-M., a minor
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Targeted Justice v. Garland
as 23-20342
Plaintiff / Appellant: Targeted Justice, Incorporated, Winter O. Calvert, Leonid Bir and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Christopher Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Terpsehore Maras, et al v. Mayfield City School District Board of Education, et al
as 22-3915
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERPSEHORE MARAS
Plaintiff: P. M., a minor, by and through her parent, Terpsehore Maras
Defendant / Appellee: MAYFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, RON FORNARO, in his individual and official capacities as a member of the Mayfield City School District Board of Education, SUE GROSZEK, in her individual and official capacities as a member of the Mayfield City School District Board of Education and others
Irene Bailey, et al v. Edwin Dumaguindin, et al
as 22-56001
Plaintiff / Appellee: IRENE BAILEY, as the representative for the Estate of Anthony McClain, Sr. and ARCHIE BARRY, individually, and as successor-in-interest for Decedent, Anthony McClain
Plaintiff: DIONDRA WILLIAMS, Guardian ad Litem for Minor S.M., SOLEMULI AFAESE, Guardian ad Litem for Minor A.M. and B. A. M., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Kimberly Jenkins, individually and as successor in interest to Anthony Guydale McClain, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant: PASADENA PD OFC EDWIN DUMAGUINDIN, OFC C. ROSA, CHIEF JOHN PEREZ and others
N.O. et al v. New York City Department of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05645
Plaintiff: N.O. and N.O. on behalf of her child M.O-M., a minor
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?