Cases 1 - 10 of 38
ROBINSON et al v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
CHE CAMERON, JENNIFER JONES, B. R. and others
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Citizens Financial Bank v. Grovertown LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Citizens Financial Bank
Defendant:
Grovertown LLC, Mike Pop, Bobby A Pop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
CALDWELL v. JETT et al
as 2:2010cv00141
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and B. R. JETT
Petitioner:
MARTIN CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CALDWELL v. JETT et al
as 2:2010cv00129
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and B. R. JETT
Petitioner:
MARTIN CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THURMOND v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
D'ALAN R. THURMOND
Defendant:
H. MARBERRY, B. R. JETT and S. KEILMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTEAT v. JETT et al
as 2:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COTEAT
Defendant:
B. R. JETT, LT. BRECHBILL, KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00175
Petitioner:
STEVE ALLEN
Respondent:
HELEN J MARBERRY, B. R. JETT and HARLEY G LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARNAOUT v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00055
Petitioner:
ENAAM ARNAOUT
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY and B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHAPMAN v. JETT et al
as 2:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
SEIFULLAH CHAPMAN
Defendant:
B. R. JETT, PAUL MCNULTY, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
