Cases 1 - 10 of 368
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burgess v. City of St Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
City of St Joseph, Missouri, St. Joseph Police Department, Officer Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brooke v. Douglas County Sheriffs Department et al
as 6:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Duane Brooke
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Department and Christopher Degase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Shire v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Marie Dean, Brooke J. Marr, Justin E. Shire and others
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Gabriel T Brooks
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
