Cases 1 - 10 of 148
White v. Burns
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jermeal G. White
Defendant:
D. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00206
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burns
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Glenville Homes III et al. v. Cox
as 1:2024cv01048
Defendant:
Learia Cox
Plaintiff:
Daniel Burns, Glenville Homes III, Famicos Foundation Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atwell v. Kane Logistics, Inc., et al.
as 5:2024cv01203
Defendant:
Charles Ikey, Kane Logistics, Inc. and Kelli Burns
Plaintiff:
Tyler Atwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burns v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv01032
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Keith Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Burns et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Tim Burns and Mary Burns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00333
Petitioner:
Michael W. Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America et al. v. Bartell et al.
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Anthony G. Peart
Defendant:
Jonathan Bartell, Kari L. Burns, Jessica Lucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael Burns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burns v. North Star Painting Co., Inc.
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Burns
Defendant:
North Star Painting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
